<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User 2.0</title>
	<link>http://www.drdigipol.com/2007/02/17/user-20/</link>
	<description>Caring for Politics in the Digital Age</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dr. DigiPol  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Is Participation on Web 2.0 Sites Low?</title>
		<link>http://www.drdigipol.com/2007/02/17/user-20/#comment-3354</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drdigipol.com/2007/02/17/user-20/#comment-3354</guid>
					<description>[...] er reflection of the contribution participation of the equation. 	Finally, and I have long argued against the way people use the phrase Web 2.0.  If we use it to mean that Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] er reflection of the contribution participation of the equation. 	Finally, and I have long argued against the way people use the phrase Web 2.0.  If we use it to mean that Web [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mediabureau</title>
		<link>http://www.drdigipol.com/2007/02/17/user-20/#comment-1978</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.drdigipol.com/2007/02/17/user-20/#comment-1978</guid>
					<description>Is it possible that Citizen 1.0  might have emerged through the countries first Neighborhood Association? Northern Liberties? Citizen 1.0 certainly climaxed at the Declaration. Do we know of any dispute with this assertion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Is it possible that Citizen 1.0  might have emerged through the countries first Neighborhood Association? Northern Liberties? Citizen 1.0 certainly climaxed at the Declaration. Do we know of any dispute with this assertion?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
